Table of Contents  
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 5  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 234-243

Ultrasound assessment of pelvic venous reflux


Whiteley Clinics, London, UK

Date of Web Publication11-Dec-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Angie M White
Whiteley Clinics, London
UK
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijves.ijves_84_18

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
White AM, Holdstock JM. Ultrasound assessment of pelvic venous reflux. Indian J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2018;5:234-43

How to cite this URL:
White AM, Holdstock JM. Ultrasound assessment of pelvic venous reflux. Indian J Vasc Endovasc Surg [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 Mar 20];5:234-43. Available from: http://www.indjvascsurg.org/text.asp?2018/5/4/234/247277




  Introduction Top


This is the Whiteley Clinic Protocol for diagnosing pelvic venous reflux in females. A three-part ultrasound examination of transabdominal (TADUS), transvaginal (TVDUS), and translabial (TLDUS) is utilized to gain a full diagnostic picture of the inferior vena cava (IVC), bilateral renal vein (right renal vein [RRV] and left renal vein [LRV]), ovarian vein (OV; right OV [ROV] and left OV [LOV]), common iliac vein (CIV; right CIV and left CIV [LCIV]), internal iliac vein (IIV; right IIV [RIIV] and left IIV [LIIV]), and external iliac veins (EIV; right EIV and left EIV). Since 2000, we have performed TVDUS and TLDUS for evaluation of pelvic reflux,[1] while other groups have described a purely transabdominal technique.[2] In 2016, we introduced TADUS alongside our existing protocol. We feel that this three-part examination provides additional anatomical information useful for guidance during pelvic vein embolization (PVE), while keeping with the high diagnostic level of transvaginal imaging. As with leg varicose veins, there are many various pelvic vein patterns. Pelvic reflux is relatively common in women. However, true compression syndromes are relatively rare in our experience.

The primary goal of the examination is to assess for venous reflux, which is described generally as reversal of flow in the venous system. Reflux is graded on a scale of 1 to 4:

  1. Absent
  2. Not significant (mild, intermittent reflux, lasting <0.5 s)
  3. Significant (persistent reflux lasting either the entire length of physical maneuvers as described below or for ≥0.5 s)
  4. Very significant (passive reflux or reflux lasting past the physical maneuver).


Other findings may include the following:

  1. Trunk diameter ≥5 mm. Smaller trunks with persistent reflux should be considered as it has been shown that diameter does not indicate reflux with confidence[3]
  2. Venous trunks exhibit filling/dilation with physical maneuvers as well as reflux
  3. Contralateral or ipsilateral siphon effects between OVs and IIVs. Siphon effects are seen with significant reflux in one trunk, with a corresponding suction effect with increased antegrade flow in an opposing trunk. This can be seen either passively or with physical maneuvers
  4. Associated varices exhibit filling/distension and flow reversal on physical maneuvers.


It is also important to evaluate for venous compression or scarring within the pelvic-associated venous system. Compression pathologies most commonly known are nutcracker phenomenon (NCP), in which LRV is compressed between aorta and superior mesenteric artery (SMA), and iliac vein compression, in which LCIV is compressed between proximal right common iliac artery and spine. Either of these two phenomena can occur with or without symptoms and their associated syndromes: nutcracker syndrome and May–Thurner syndrome. Other types of extrinsic compressions or congenital anomalies may be seen, and therefore, it is important to correlate overall patient presentation and symptoms with ultrasound findings. If findings do not fit with presentation, consider other pathologies.


  Patient Preparation Top


To increase diagnostic efficacy of the ultrasound, it is important to minimize the presence of bowel gas. The following patient preparation is advised:

  1. 24 h before examination


    1. Consumption of low fiber/low gas-producing diet
    2. Avoidance of carbonated beverages and a limit of smoking and chewing gum if possible.


  2. At least 4 h before examination


    1. No food to be taken by mouth. Clear, nongaseous fluids are recommended to maintain normal hydration (will enhance imaging due to appropriate dilatation of the venous system).


  3. Medication


    1. Oral administration of simeticone, an antifoaming agent for use in reduction in bowel gas
    2. Timings for administration: evening before the examination at mealtime and bedtime and upon waking in the morning (or several hours before an afternoon examination) (Note: follow medication instructions and warnings. Not to be used if allergic or during pregnancy).



  Patient History Top


Obtain a detailed obstetric, gynecological, and venous history to include the following:

  1. Number of pregnancies and mode of delivery (normal vaginal delivery, trial of labor, or cesarean section)
  2. History of gynecological or urological disease, investigations, or surgery
  3. Current symptoms associated with pelvic congestion syndrome and their severity (as previously discussed), as well as their evolution
  4. History of venous disease, investigations, or surgery, as well as current venous state of the legs.



  The Ultrasound Examination Top


Transabdominal ultrasound

Patient position

Initial position is nearly sitting (80° recumbent) to assess upper abdominal veins [Figure 1]. As it is similar to standing position during lower extremity venous duplex for reflux assessment, gravity and hydrostatic pressure will aid in demonstrating reflux. It is also thought that a true NCP will be more clearly visualized.[4] The patient is then reclined to 45° for veins at or below the umbilicus for ease in visualization.
Figure 1: Patient position: 80° upright, corresponding ultrasound images transverse, and longitudinal left renal vein

Click here to view


Equipment and settings

A curvilinear transducer is preferred (C5-1, Philips Healthcare, Bothell, Washington, USA) with the system optimized for high-resolution imaging of abdominal vasculature. Resolution should be set as a preference over frame rate, with the highest frequency selected for penetration needed. Color pulse repetition frequency (PRF) should be optimized for moderate-to-low velocity flow (10–15 cm/s).

Standard protocol

Ensure a light scan pressure is used, especially when evaluating for compression, as the vein wall can be extrinsically compressed easily due to wall pliability and low pressure within the lumen [Figure 2]. A thorough evaluation with the following views should be undertaken:
Figure 2: Normal left renal vein, transverse plane. Left image heavy transducer pressure, left renal vein anterior to posterior diameter compressed to 1.3 mm. Light pressure application on right, 3.1 mm anterior to posterior diameter

Click here to view


Left renal vein

Rule out underlying NCP. LRV can course anteriorly between SMA and aorta (mesoaortic LRV [MA-LRV]), posteriorly between the aorta and spine (retroaortic LRV [RA-LRV]), or both. Pay close attention for collaterals that may drain into LRV, as there are many variants of drainage from LOV. Follow collaterals as distally as possible. Physical maneuvers, as described below, can be used to rule out true pathology.

  1. Measure Widest anterior to posterior (A-P) diameters of the hilar segment of the LRV (H-LRV), MA-LRV, and/or RA-LRV [Figure 3]. Calculate ratio of H-LRV: MA-LRV and/or H-LRV: RA-LRV. A ratio of ≥5:1 can be indicative of NCP;[5] however, we have shown that elevated ratios can be seen in patients with significant proximal LOV reflux. In these cases, narrow A-P diameters of MA-LRV represent a “pseudo-nutcracker” phenomenon, caused by siphon effect of LOV reflux, rather than true anatomical pathology.[6] In our experience, a true NCP is very rare
  2. A longitudinal view of MA-LRV can provide valuable information about the structure of the vein [Figure 4], with a narrow craniocaudal width seen in true NCP
  3. Use color flow Doppler (CFD) on H-LRV and MA-LRV; check for direction of flow and fill. With significant proximal LOV reflux, MA-LRV may be underfilled due to LOV siphon
  4. Following with diagnostic criteria introduced by several authors,[5] measurements of H-LRV and MA-LRV velocities and angle of SMA to aorta can be taken. However, in our experience, we have found little correlation between these measurements and true NCP.
Figure 3: Normal left renal vein transverse plane. Mesoaortic left renal vein anterior to posterior diameter is 3.8 mm, hilar segment of the left renal vein 7.2 mm, diameter ratio 1.9

Click here to view
Figure 4: Longitudinal image; ellipse measurement normal cross-sectional area mesoaortic left renal vein and normal craniocaudal length and superior mesenteric artery–aortic angle

Click here to view


Right renal vein

Evaluate to provide comparison to the contralateral vein. Anomalies in anatomical presentation, such as duplicate RRV or ROV insertion into RRV rather than IVC, are noted.

Bilateral ovarian veins

ROV and LOV can be seen, even without dilatation, on most patients who are well prepped. To locate ROV, start with IVC in transverse at RRV level. Proximal ROV will be seen with a slow caudal sweep, typically inserting around 10:00 on a clock face [Figure 5], 1–2 cm below RRV. For LOV, start with LRV in transverse, and again scan slowly caudally. Unless there is collateralization, it will be the only vein seen joining LRV on the caudal surface. Follow both OVs distally into the pelvis, noting collateral vessels or anomalous anatomy which will be useful for access guidance during PVE. Distally, they can be seen draping over the iliac veins, originating from the ovaries [Figure 6].
Figure 5: Right ovarian vein termination into inferior vena cava, transverse view. Right ovarian vein (yellow circle) at 10:00 o'clock position

Click here to view
Figure 6: Left ovarian vein anatomical representation, draping over left iliac veins. Credit: Barrie Price, The Whiteley Clinic

Click here to view


Use both grayscale and CFD, noting diameter and flow direction in a longitudinal plane [Figure 7]a and [Figure 7]b. Maneuvers (as below) can be used to elicit reflux if not seen passively. Note location of insertions of ROV into IVC and LOV into LRV, as well as any collateral vessels or anomalous anatomy.
Figure 7: Longitudinal proximal right ovarian vein (a) and left ovarian vein (b)

Click here to view


Inferior vena cava and common iliac veins

Image IVC and CIVs in their entirety, both with grayscale and CFD. Note any abnormalities, narrowing, or scarring. Carefully evaluate proximal LCIV as this is a common site for extrinsic compression. Again, a light scan pressure should be utilized [Figure 8]. For LCIV imaging:
Figure 8: Left common iliac vein transducer pressure effectively narrowing anterior to posterior diameter to 4.7 mm (left) versus 9.0 (right)

Click here to view


  1. Evaluate with grayscale in both longitudinal and transverse as the LCIV courses between right common iliac artery and spine [Figure 9]. A compression can be indicated with significant narrowing [Figure 10] as well as venous dilatation just distal to the constriction
  2. Color aliasing or absence of CFD will likely be seen at a site of compression, with underfill distally due to slow flow
  3. Evaluate with spectral Doppler for phasic and spontaneous flow (ensure angle is corrected to ≤60°) [Figure 11]. Increased velocities and loss of phasicity may be representative of underlying compression
  4. Again, physical maneuvers can be utilized to rule out physiology versus pathology (see below).
Figure 9: Normal left common iliac vein, transverse view

Click here to view
Figure 10: Narrowed left common iliac vein. May–Thurner syndrome diagnosed on symptoms plus ultrasound presentation. Diagnosis confirmed by other diagnostic modalities

Click here to view
Figure 11: Normal proximal left common iliac vein, spectral Doppler, spontaneous and phasic flow

Click here to view


Bilateral external iliac veins

Check for narrowing and signs of obstruction with grayscale. CFD can assist to evaluate for webbing or scarring. Assess for symmetric phasic and spontaneous flow with spectral Doppler. Again, maintain light scan pressure.

Bilateral internal iliac veins

Follow the EIVs in longitudinal cranially, IIVs will come into view mid-pelvis [Figure 12]. If significant bowel gas is in the area, move the transducer lateral to EIV in the mid-pelvis and angle the probe medially with deep pressure. Anatomical representation of tributaries is seen in [Figure 13].
Figure 12: Internal iliac vein mid pelvis, oblique view

Click here to view
Figure 13: Anatomical diagram, distal pelvic veins. Credit: Barrie Price, The Whiteley Clinic

Click here to view


  1. Utilize a heavy scan pressure as they are not commonly compressed by the transducer (due to their depth)
  2. Evaluate direction of flow with CFD [Figure 14]
  3. Use physical maneuvers as below
  4. Image IIVs and tributaries into the deep pelvis and note communication into the lower extremities or groin.
Figure 14: Bilateral internal iliac veins. Left internal iliac vein passive reflux, right antegrade

Click here to view


Kidneys and bladder area

Evaluate for symmetrical renal size and for any pathology. If TVDUS cannot be performed, evaluate periurethral and bladder area for refluxing varices.

Physical maneuvers

Venous flow is dynamic and changes with body position and normal physiological processes. With suspicion of venous compression or obstruction, several maneuvers can be utilized to determine physiology versus physiology.

Narrow MA-LRV diameter seen sitting is likely physiological if any of the below positions or maneuvers result in a diameter increase:

  1. Lateral decubitus (right lateral decubitus, left lateral decubitus [LLD]) position
  2. Trendelenburg position (useful with “pseudo-nutcracker” NCP to mitigate effects of gravity and hydrostatic pressure) [Figure 15]a,[Figure 15]b,[Figure 15]c
  3. Deep inspiration [Figure 16]
  4. Valsalva.
Figure 15: Serial images, same patient, mesoaortic left renal vein at 80° upright, 9:1 ratio, NCP classification (a). Trendelenberg position 20 minutes, ratios normalized to 2:1 (b). Postembolization, normal left ovarian vein ratio 3:1 in 80° upright (c), confirming physiological Pseudo-nutcracker phenomenon

Click here to view
Figure 16: Left renal vein at rest (left) and deep inspiration (right), physiological narrow mesoaortic left renal vein. Anterior to posterior diameters increase from 0.6 mm to 2.9 mm

Click here to view


For suspicion of LCIV compression or obstruction, LLD or deep inspiration can dilate a narrowing if it is physiological.

Use Valsalva (simulates proximal compression) or a Kegel squeeze (simulates distal compression) when assessing OVs, IIVs, and any associated varices to elicit reflux if not seen passively.

Transabdominal ultrasound only

If a patient cannot tolerate transvaginal scanning, the most distal segments of OVs and IIVs must be carefully evaluated and followed as deep into the pelvis as possible.

Transvaginal ultrasound

TVDUS is extremely useful for assessing patterns of distal reflux and communication to lower extremities due to its high resolution (in comparison with TADUS). Make a full assessment of distal OVs and IIVs, communicating tributaries, contra- and ipsi-lateral shunting, and pelvic varices.

Patient position

Semirecumbent with head reclined to 45°. A bolster cushion may be required to allow full manipulation of the transducer unless a drop-ended gynecological couch is available. Knees should be flexed; feet placed wide apart [Figure 17].
Figure 17: Patient position for transvaginal ultrasound. Head of bed lowered to 45°. Uterus with arcuate vein dilatation

Click here to view


Equipment and settings

Transvaginal transducer is necessary (C10-3 v, Philips Healthcare, Bothell, Washington, USA), with the system optimized for highest resolution possible at depth of pelvic organs. Resolution should be set as a preference over frame rate, with highest frequency setting selected for the transducer. Color PRF should be optimized for low-velocity flow (5–8 cm/s).

Standard protocol

The patient must be aware of the nature of the examination and consent obtained. The transducer should be covered with an appropriate probe cover and sterile lubricant. Empty bladder is preferable. In our experience, TVDUS is well tolerated with minimal discomfort. Use a very gentle scan technique to avoid compression or distortion of vascular anatomy.

A survey of the entire pelvis should be made in both longitudinal and coronal planes to assess anatomical orientation and pathology of the pelvic organs. Thereafter, coronal or coronal/oblique planes are most useful for evaluating the trunks and their tributaries. Angle the transducer into right and left lateral fornixes of the cervix to view IIVs and OVs. Anterior and posterior fornixes are useful for imaging anterior and posterior vaginal wall, urethra, and anal ring. Experience will deem preference for sequence of evaluation – several sonographers in our facility prefer to start with OVs, while others prefer IIVs due to their fixed location. Physical maneuvers (as below) are required in all vein territories to elicit reflux.

Bilateral ovarian veins

Start with the ovary in a coronal view, angle anterior, and the vein will be seen leading to the bottom of the image [Figure 18]a and [Figure 18]b. Due to their anterior position, it may be necessary for the patient to tilt hips upward to angle the transducer fully. The more distal portion of the OV typically lies less anterior between uterus and ovaries and also slightly anterior to IIVs [Figure 19]. Varices can be seen in this area and will likely communicate with the distal IIV through the uterine vein.
Figure 18: Left ovarian vein imaging. Ultrasound field of view schematic diagram (a). The top of the image is distal, bottom is proximal. Gross distal ovarian vein reflux (b), left ovary (contains hemorrhagic cyst) lies lateral to the vein

Click here to view
Figure 19: Left ovarian vein with varices communicating to left internal iliac vein

Click here to view


Bilateral internal iliac veins and their tributaries

These veins lie to the lateral sidewall of the pelvis [Figure 20]a and [Figure 20]b and more posterior than the OVs, the transducer should be angled to their position [Figure 21]. It may be necessary to withdraw the probe slightly to see the very distal tributaries.
Figure 20: Ultrasound field of view schematic diagram (a), corresponding grayscale image (b)

Click here to view
Figure 21: Left internal iliac vein transducer angled to left lateral fornix

Click here to view


Pelvic varices

Other areas within the pelvis should be evaluated for varices and reflux as below, with and without physical maneuvers. Use a coronal orientation for evaluation.

  1. Arcuate veins of the uterus [Figure 22]. Note flow as this is a common path for drainage of contralateral reflux.
  2. Periuterine/uterine plexus, seen by angling the transducer slightly to the left and right of the uterus.
  3. Vaginal wall, seen by withdrawing the transducer slightly externally, and angle anterior toward the cervix.
  4. Periurethral [Figure 23]. Withdraw the transducer further toward the entrance of the vagina, and angle further anterior toward the pubic symphysis. Varicose veins in this location typically are responsible for the bladder symptoms.
  5. Perianal. With the transducer in the same position as above, angle posterior toward the anal canal. Varicosities will be seen distal to the anal ring, and hemorrhoids can be seen extending into the anal canal if they are present [Figure 24].
Figure 22: Arcuate vein dilation with reflux

Click here to view
Figure 23: Periurethral refluxing varicosities

Click here to view
Figure 24: Anal ring with refluxing varicosities on Valsalva

Click here to view


Physical maneuvers

All veins seen tranvaginally should be evaluated with and without Valsalva and a Kegel squeeze.

Translabial ultrasound

Varices associated with pelvic venous reflux frequently are present in the vulva but likely will not protrude on clinical examination [as with [Figure 25]. Patient history is relevant, labial or vaginal wall varices noted during pregnancy or labial dragging/throbbing/itching can indicate their presence. Ultrasound assessment will show small-to-large caliber refluxing veins within the labia [Figure 26].
Figure 25: Protruding labial varicose veins. Nontypical visual presentation, frequently seen only with ultrasound

Click here to view
Figure 26: Large caliber variosities in labial area

Click here to view


Patient position

Semi-recumbent, with head reclined to 45°. Knees should be flexed, and feet placed wide apart as with TVDUS.

Equipment and settings

A high-frequency linear transducer is preferable (we use a L18-5, Philips Healthcare, Bothell, Washington, USA) with system optimized for high-resolution superficial imaging. Resolution should be set as a preference over frame rate, with highest frequency setting selected for that transducer. Color PRF should be optimized for low-velocity flow (3–5 cm/s).

Standard protocol

It is preferable to cover the transducer with a cover and sterile lubricant. Evaluate both superficial and deep vulva [Figure 25]. Follow varices into the upper thigh or groin to view connection to lower extremity venous pattern. Other exit points, such as perineal, inguinal, clitoral, obturator, and superior/inferior gluteal points, should be evaluated.[7]

Physical maneuvers

The below maneuvers can be used to elicit reflux:

  1. Valsalva
  2. Kegel squeeze
  3. A cough (usually the most successful way to elicit reflux in the vulvar region).



  Ultrasound Assessment for Pelvic Reflux in Males Top


Male pelvic ultrasound follows generally the same protocol as above, obviously without TVDUS. It is important to image as distal as possible transabdominally, evaluating for communication to the legs. Significant pressure may be required for distal imaging, and patient preparation is important.

Evaluate bilateral testis and epididymis for underlying pathology and symmetric volume. A unilateral reduction in testicular volume can be seen with significant and chronic varicocele. Assess for varicocele, which typically lies lateral to the testicle, but varices can be seen posterior or anterior within the scrotal sac and may extend into the inguinal canal, upper thigh, or groin area.

The testicular vein (TV) can be seen originating from the testes, passing through the inguinal canal [Figure 28] and draining upward into the LRV. It typically lies fairly superficial, at 1–2 cm in depth. If dilated, it likely can be seen in its entirety. Evaluate longitudinally and utilize CFD as with the OVs. Valsalva or Kegel maneuvers can be useful when imaging IIVs, TVs, and any varices seen. Assess upper thigh, perineal, suprapubic, and groin areas for communication to the legs. In our experience, TV/IIV communication appears to be less common in men than in women (OV/IIV), but there are often complex varicose communications between distal TVs in the inguinal canal and ipsilateral EIV or IIV.
Figure 27: Schematic diagram of pre- and post-pelvic vein embolization showing resolution of “pseudo-nutcracker”. Credit: Barrie Price, The Whiteley Clinic

Click here to view
Figure 28: Refluxing left testicular vein inguinal canal (right image), right scrotal varicocele (left image)

Click here to view



  Postembolization Ultrasound Top


Repeat the technique described previously to assess for successful embolization, and information regarding veins treated during PVE should be at hand. Transabdominally, coils can be seen in the proximal to distal OVs [Figure 29]. If a “pseudo-nutcracker” was seen pre-PVE, this should be resolved [Figure 27]. For persistent ≥5:1 ratios, evaluate for variant anatomy of LRV and LOV (such as MA-LRV plus RA-LRV pathway, or LOV recanalization or collateralization). Carefully assess for coil migration, especially in EIVs as well as at insertions of ROV into IVC, LOV into LRV, and terminations of RIIV/LIIVs. Transvaginally, distal coils can be seen [Figure 30]. Evaluate all areas visualized coils with CFD and the described maneuvers. Any new reflux or unsuccessful treatment should be noted, and if significant, may need further treatment.
Figure 29: Coils can be seen in the proximal right ovarian vein (yellow circle), but not extending into inferior vena cava

Click here to view
Figure 30: Coiled distal left ovarian vein, no residual reflux (right image), coils in left ovarian vein and Left internal iliac vein (left image)

Click here to view



  Lower Extremity Venous Duplex Ultrasound: When to Suspect Pelvic Vein Reflux Top


When performing a duplex of the legs to evaluate for venous reflux, it is important to assess for signs of pelvic reflux in every patient, both men and women. Some key indications for pelvic reflux with communication to legs are:

  1. Presence of varicose veins in the upper proximal thighs, which may or may not be seen on clinical examination
  2. Atypical patterns of varicose veins which are not associated with truncal reflux
  3. Recurrent varicose veins.


Scan the proximal inner thigh up toward the groin, the posterior thigh toward the buttock crease and anal area, and lateral thigh toward the hip. It may be useful for the patient to bring their leg up on “tip-toe” for adequate visualization. Follow any varices cranially. Note that not all varicose veins of pelvic origin are seen in isolation, without truncal reflux.

Some typical presentations of varicose veins of pelvic origin are shown below, both in photographic and reflux scan diagram form. Upper thigh varices can vary in size, and even those that are ≤1 mm can be of clinical significance. Elongate the vein and utilize CFD. A cough will typically elicit reflux if it is pelvic.

Anterior-pelvic communication patterns

Anteromedical varicose veins lying superficial to the area of the adductor longus tendon [Figure 31] will not necessarily be obvious on clinical examination. A key indicator to their presence by ultrasound may be truncal reflux within the great saphenous vein (GSV) up to the proximal third of the thigh but not extending into proximal GSV or sapheno–femoral junction (SFJ). Proximal thigh varices may join on to any other trunk or none at all.
Figure 31: Anteromedial leg varices arising from pelvic source. Patient presentation and several representative diagrams of pelvic reflux

Click here to view


Antero-lateral varices can be seen coursing toward the hip and can join with the AASV and/or its tributaries.

Posterior pelvic communication patterns

Posterior varices [Figure 32] are common with pelvic vein reflux. Typically, a small- vessel pattern will be observed, with ≤2 mm diameter varices and extensive thread veins. This pattern type can be one of the most symptomatic, with lower extremity aching and throbbing. The varices may also lead to the buttock crease, distal or proximal buttock, or lateral hip area.
Figure 32: Posterior leg varices arising from pelvic source with typical small-scale posterior varicose veins. Several representations of reflux patterns are demonstrated

Click here to view


The varices may communicate directly onto the vein of Giacomini in the posterior thigh, and varices arising from Giacomini perforator veins may be present. Pain and aching in the area can be reported, especially when in an extended seated position.

Recurrent leg varicose veins

Pelvic vein reflux is a common finding with recurrent varicose veins, and patterns may be simple or complex. Simple patterns may present after successful ligation of the SFJ, sometimes with removal of the proximal third of the GSV, but without significant formation of neovascular tissue. Residual GSV in the mid-thigh is seen refluxing with communicating varices on the medial aspect of the thigh up to the pelvis [Figure 33]. Patients with more complex patterns might have gross neovascular recurrence at the SFJ and within the GSV strip track in addition to communicating varices to the pelvis. Varices may not be visible to the eye.
Figure 33: Recurrent leg varicose veins after high saphenous ligation merging from vulvar area and incision site. Representative reflux diagrams

Click here to view



  Conclusion Top


With experience and high-quality imaging, ultrasound is a useful tool for the assessment of pelvic venous reflux. It is a dynamic test providing a true picture of pathophysiology and flow hemodynamics rather than relying on anatomy and vein diameter alone. It is less expensive and less invasive than other radiology methods such as CT, MR, or venography. Patient position can be modified to fit the indication and goal of the examination. Limitations include operator dependence, poor patient preparation, and low-quality imaging equipment. Recent technology advances including dynamic CFD 3D/4D [Figure 34] should increase diagnostic confidence, making TVDUS imaging more accessible to the less experienced operator.
Figure 34: Four-dimensional color flow Doppler rotational ultrasound. Right internal iliac vein with superimposed obturator and pudendal varices, 90° rotation showing separation

Click here to view


Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Whiteley MS, Santos SJ, Harrison CC, Holdstock JM, Lopez AJ. Transvaginal duplex ultrasonography appears to be the gold standard investigation for the haemodynamic evaluation of pelvic venous reflux in the ovarian and internal iliac veins in women. Phlebology 2015;30:706-13.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Labropoulos N, Jasinski PT, Adrahtas D, Gasparis AP, Meissner MH. A standardized ultrasound approach to pelvic congestion syndrome. Phlebology 2017;32:608-19.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Dos Santos SJ, Holdstock JM, Harrison CC, Lopez AJ, Whiteley MS. Ovarian vein diameter cannot be used as an indicator of ovarian venous reflux. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2015;49:90-4.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Fitoz S, Ekim M, Ozcakar ZB, Elhan AH, Yalcinkaya F. Nutcracker syndrome in children: The role of upright position examination and superior mesenteric artery angle measurement in the diagnosis. J Ultrasound Med 2007;26:573-80.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Kurklinsky AK, Rooke TW. Nutcracker phenomenon and nutcracker syndrome. Mayo Clin Proc 2010;85:552-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Holdstock JM, White AM, Beckett D, Fernandez-Hart TJ, Ashpitel H, Nemchand JL, et al. Nutcracker Phenomena can be Over-Diagnosed by Duplex Ultrasound-Left Ovarian Vein Reflux can be the Cause of Renal Vein Narrowing Rather than an Effect of Obstructive Flow. 31st Annual Conference of the American College of Phlebology. First Prize -Best Research Paper of Conference. Autin, Texas; 2017.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Franceschi C, Cappelli M, Ermini S, Gianesini S, Mendoza E, Passariello F, et al. CHIVA: Hemodynamic concept, strategy and results. Int Angiol 2016;35:8-30.  Back to cited text no. 7
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10], [Figure 11], [Figure 12], [Figure 13], [Figure 14], [Figure 15], [Figure 16], [Figure 17], [Figure 18], [Figure 19], [Figure 20], [Figure 21], [Figure 22], [Figure 23], [Figure 24], [Figure 25], [Figure 26], [Figure 27], [Figure 28], [Figure 29], [Figure 30], [Figure 31], [Figure 32], [Figure 33], [Figure 34]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
  Introduction
  Patient Preparation
  Patient History
   The Ultrasound E...
   Ultrasound Asses...
   Postembolization...
   Lower Extremity ...
  Conclusion
   References
   Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed534    
    Printed80    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded28    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]