ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 370-375

Evaluation of carbon dioxide angiography in lower limb angioplasties of peripheral arterial disease patients with borderline chronic kidney disease compared to the standard contrast agent


Department of Vascular Surgery, Institute of Vascular and Endovascular Sciences, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
Nikhil Vilas Chaudhari
Department of Vascular Surgery, Institute of Vascular and Endovascular Sciences, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Delhi
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijves.ijves_61_20

Rights and Permissions

Introduction: Assessment of carbon dioxide (CO2) angiography for its efficacy and limitations in lower limb angioplasties for chronic limb-threatening limb ischemia needs to be evaluated in detail, as the use of CO2 as a contrast agent has a distinct advantage over conventional iodinated contrast medium (ICM) in patients with borderline chronic kidney disease (CKD), with respect to nephrotoxicity caused by the later. Aims and Objectives: To study the quality of angiography images obtained with CO2 as a contrast agent and the efficacy of CO2 angiography in guiding lower limb angioplasties for critical limb ischemia. Design: This was a prospective, observational, comparative, cohort study. Study Period: September 2017–December 2018. Materials and Methods: Patients of critical limb ischemia with raised serum creatinine level (>1.49 mg/dL) who were not on the dialysis and undergoing endovascular revascularization were enrolled in the study. Hand injections were made using CO2 Angioset. Intraoperative evaluation of image quality obtained using CO2 was done by two vascular surgeons and compared with conventional contrast medium. Necessary therapeutic intervention was performed using CO2 angiography image if reliable image was acquired using the same. Results: A total of 100 patients were evaluated consisting of 176 arterial segments, out of which 145 segments required use of ICM and 31 segments were intervened using CO2 only as a contrast agent (19 superficial femoral artery, 6 common iliac artery, 2 pop artery, 3 external iliac artery, and 1 anterior tibial artery). Assessment of scores given by the observer 1 and observer 2 was performed by their comparison for the statistical significance using McNemar–Bowker test and was found to be statistically significant with P = 0.02. Kendall's Tau b coefficient is 0.74 (significant) and Cohen's kappa is 0.63 (significant). Good-quality images were seen in above the knee (ATK) segment in 39.3% and moderate in 57.8%. However, below the knee (BTK) segments received poor image quality score in majority, i.e., 82.6%. There was significant reduction observed in the total volume of ICM. No major adverse reaction/complication encountered during the procedures was observed, except pain being the most common and distressing complication. Conclusions: CO2 angiography is a very useful tool in the armamentarium of vascular surgeon, especially while performing angioplasties for peripheral arterial disease in borderline CKD patients, not on dialysis, because it not only reduces the amount of iodinated contrast used but also has good imaging ability in ATK vessels. It was fought with multiple issues while imaging BTK vessels, leading to reduction in its reliability and feasibility in that segment.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed100    
    Printed2    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded2    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal